Helping stakeholders understand what meaningful refugee participation means, measure their current capability, and put it into practice.
Meaningful refugee participation is well-established as the most effective way to respond to the refugee crisis — yet shifting toward it is genuinely difficult, because it requires shifting power dynamics and transferring decision-making power to refugees.
The MRP Training and Index build stronger capability among non-refugee stakeholders: deeper understanding of what MRP means and where power lies in decision-making, sustainable systems and processes for MRP, and ongoing support to put it into practice — including through the Refugee Participation Training and Analysis published in our reports.
Read the training analysis
MRP isn't a checkbox — a consultation and a co-decision aren't the same thing. The Index gives stakeholders a way to locate their own organisation honestly on that spectrum.
Does a refugee representative sit in the room where budgets and strategy are actually decided — or are they briefed after the decision is made?
Are participation processes ad hoc and event-based, or written into standing policy, governance structures and budgets?
Is refugee input followed by visible change and reported back — or does it disappear into a report no one revisits?
An organisation completes the MRP Index for itself — an honest self-assessment against the three dimensions above.
A facilitated session unpacks the results, grounded in real case studies from APNOR's Refugee Participation Training and Analysis.
The organisation leaves with concrete, sequenced steps to shift practice — not just awareness of the problem.
Non-refugee stakeholders can request the training and index for their team.